Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-03 14:05:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2114C2A73D83C9D61A697D8DCC185FF70BBE832014194A7F4393D79A436DB939
Participant Details

Original Note:

Captions are Fair Use Hughes vs Benjamin; a work can be transformative even when it consists entirely of portions of an original work. Plaintiff reuploaded portions adding only a title. As the title was created for the purpose of criticism & commentary, it was ruled Fair Use https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6144341/hughes-v-benjamin/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1925118144122638830
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2114C2A73D83C9D61A697D8DCC185FF70BBE832014194A7F4393D79A436DB939
  • createdAtMillis - 1748959515287
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 19251181441226388302114C2A73D83C9D61A697D8DCC185FF70BBE832014194A7F4393D79A436DB939