Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-05-21 09:15:07 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Captions are Fair Use Hughes vs Benjamin; a work can be transformative even when it consists entirely of portions of an original work. Plaintiff reuploaded portions adding only a title. As the title was created for the purpose of criticism & commentary, it was ruled Fair Use https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6144341/hughes-v-benjamin/

Written by E9F60A63D1CD57DD3A9B27863764CA797D00476B92030BEA319EDD9CA3FB667C
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1925118144122638830
• noteId - 1925118144122638830
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - E9F60A63D1CD57DD3A9B27863764CA797D00476B92030BEA319EDD9CA3FB667C
• createdAtMillis - 1747818907181
• tweetId - 1924846994738000236
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• Captions are Fair Use Hughes vs Benjamin; a work can be transformative even when it consists entirely of portions of an original work. Plaintiff reuploaded portions adding only a title. As the title was created for the purpose of criticism & commentary, it was ruled Fair Use https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6144341/hughes-v-benjamin/