Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-24 21:54:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C2C84D858B7752221201DA16342260D6FA6645F39B3401E813295A41066161C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note below is cherry picking. https://x.com/i/birdwatch/n/1881804761097294219 WHO director repudiated joint report, it was premature to rule out possible laboratory incident. WHO doesn’t support any of theories and has called on China to disclose information. WHO has pressured Chinese scientists to restore data deleted. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2305081

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1882389570689659054
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C2C84D858B7752221201DA16342260D6FA6645F39B3401E813295A41066161C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1737755676313
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1882389570689659054C2C84D858B7752221201DA16342260D6FA6645F39B3401E813295A41066161C9