Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-23 11:27:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Note below is cherry picking. https://x.com/i/birdwatch/n/1881804761097294219 WHO director repudiated joint report, it was premature to rule out possible laboratory incident. WHO doesn’t support any of theories and has called on China to disclose information. WHO has pressured Chinese scientists to restore data deleted. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2305081

Written by EE7192EF0B1C47D8A3430C3E070DA2A0BFAA58717F9133404318E9D7666B1A00
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1881645479764615632

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1882389570689659054
  • noteId - 1882389570689659054
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - EE7192EF0B1C47D8A3430C3E070DA2A0BFAA58717F9133404318E9D7666B1A00 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1737631621416
  • tweetId - 1881645479764615632
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Note below is cherry picking. https://x.com/i/birdwatch/n/1881804761097294219 WHO director repudiated joint report, it was premature to rule out possible laboratory incident. WHO doesn’t support any of theories and has called on China to disclose information. WHO has pressured Chinese scientists to restore data deleted. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2305081

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-24 15:54:36 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-23 08:25:40 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-23 14:41:21 -0600 Rating Details