Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-19 18:38:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 426FF3E05CAB57A4CA0D8B6419FFAAE103C2E2ADA6886A6DAA15829D308F04B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This lacks factual foundation. Since Politico’s retraction of the leak, one would need to look for new, credible sources or direct evidence from the House Budget Committee or other official channels. Until then, the claim should be regarded as unverified. https://www.politico.com/search?q=Leaked&adv=true&s=newest

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880994303213764917
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 426FF3E05CAB57A4CA0D8B6419FFAAE103C2E2ADA6886A6DAA15829D308F04B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1737311894816
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1880994303213764917426FF3E05CAB57A4CA0D8B6419FFAAE103C2E2ADA6886A6DAA15829D308F04B3