Birdwatch Note
2025-01-19 15:02:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This lacks factual foundation. Since Politico’s retraction of the leak, one would need to look for new, credible sources or direct evidence from the House Budget Committee or other official channels. Until then, the claim should be regarded as unverified. https://www.politico.com/search?q=Leaked&adv=true&s=newest
Written by F250172D36A6036B64C3301DE2AE67A309352CFA4D61D8F4026B274176BB7BFA
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1880744479872700454
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1880994303213764917
- noteId - 1880994303213764917
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F250172D36A6036B64C3301DE2AE67A309352CFA4D61D8F4026B274176BB7BFA Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737298963727
- tweetId - 1880744479872700454
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This lacks factual foundation. Since Politico’s retraction of the leak, one would need to look for new, credible sources or direct evidence from the House Budget Committee or other official channels. Until then, the claim should be regarded as unverified. https://www.politico.com/search?q=Leaked&adv=true&s=newest
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-19 16:09:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 14:43:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 14:14:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 13:42:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 12:38:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 12:09:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 16:01:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 15:43:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 15:33:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 13:23:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 09:17:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 16:16:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 12:42:32 -0600 | Rating Details |