Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-18 20:58:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5490DE171A20A241F2177AC107658A0243612D79A10408D8AED0C722A4ABA741
Participant Details

Original Note:

It has been previously proven by the US Supreme Court (Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, 587 U.S. ___ (2019)) that Social Media Companies (and thus, their apps) are private entities and are not bound by the first amendment. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/587/17-1702/ https://uwm.edu/freespeech/faqs/what-first-amendment-protections-exist-for-speech-on-social-media

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880644097331048866
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5490DE171A20A241F2177AC107658A0243612D79A10408D8AED0C722A4ABA741
  • createdAtMillis - 1737233928644
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18806440973310488665490DE171A20A241F2177AC107658A0243612D79A10408D8AED0C722A4ABA741