Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-18 15:51:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

It has been previously proven by the US Supreme Court (Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, 587 U.S. ___ (2019)) that Social Media Companies (and thus, their apps) are private entities and are not bound by the first amendment. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/587/17-1702/ https://uwm.edu/freespeech/faqs/what-first-amendment-protections-exist-for-speech-on-social-media

Written by A818F4DA9CF0B2145FA802035CABD73D93F053C25C7E5F9D50269A90A0BEF3BB
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1880430856793424374

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1880644097331048866
  • noteId - 1880644097331048866
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A818F4DA9CF0B2145FA802035CABD73D93F053C25C7E5F9D50269A90A0BEF3BB
  • createdAtMillis - 1737215468138
  • tweetId - 1880430856793424374
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • It has been previously proven by the US Supreme Court (Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, 587 U.S. ___ (2019)) that Social Media Companies (and thus, their apps) are private entities and are not bound by the first amendment. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/587/17-1702/ https://uwm.edu/freespeech/faqs/what-first-amendment-protections-exist-for-speech-on-social-media

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-18 16:57:15 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 11:14:39 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 10:39:02 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 12:24:16 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 12:15:38 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 11:06:53 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 10:09:07 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 16:24:46 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 14:58:48 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 12:15:18 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-19 22:27:36 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 22:24:24 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 21:15:36 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 14:15:36 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-18 11:57:24 -0600 Rating Details