Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-12 01:55:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C5B2B604C382A807CE7F3B3B16835702DD3AA8655364E478067637B6E00167C7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The legality of Jack Smith’s appointment is very questionable. Brief provided to SCOTUS by former AG Edwin Meese III, and law professors, Stephan G Calabrisi, and Gary S Lawson. Again, that Garland was this careless in an appointment this important, smells. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US%20v.%20Trump%20amicus%20final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878257709197193448
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C5B2B604C382A807CE7F3B3B16835702DD3AA8655364E478067637B6E00167C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1736646954681
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1878257709197193448C5B2B604C382A807CE7F3B3B16835702DD3AA8655364E478067637B6E00167C7