Birdwatch Note
2025-01-12 01:48:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The legality of Jack Smith’s appointment is very questionable. Brief provided to SCOTUS by former AG Edwin Meese III, and law professors, Stephan G Calabrisi, and Gary S Lawson. Again, that Garland was this careless in an appointment this important, smells. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US%20v.%20Trump%20amicus%20final.pdf
Written by 88B5633A35416558516E5775749112C2C09BCCF40A438A82A508C2C70645EB58
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1878196154715803812
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1878257709197193448
- noteId - 1878257709197193448
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 88B5633A35416558516E5775749112C2C09BCCF40A438A82A508C2C70645EB58 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736646508870
- tweetId - 1878196154715803812
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The legality of Jack Smith’s appointment is very questionable. Brief provided to SCOTUS by former AG Edwin Meese III, and law professors, Stephan G Calabrisi, and Gary S Lawson. Again, that Garland was this careless in an appointment this important, smells. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US%20v.%20Trump%20amicus%20final.pdf
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-12 13:25:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 12:09:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 10:00:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 08:51:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 07:23:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 06:25:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 05:55:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 05:11:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 00:39:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 00:26:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 00:15:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 23:38:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 22:44:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 22:18:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 21:05:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 20:59:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 20:08:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-13 10:29:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-13 05:05:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 06:37:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 06:10:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 00:32:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 21:32:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 20:55:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 20:43:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-13 10:00:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 11:31:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 09:21:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 09:10:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 02:09:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 01:36:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 23:51:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 21:41:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 21:30:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 20:53:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 20:09:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 19:55:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 19:51:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-13 21:05:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 20:25:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 16:33:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 15:59:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 10:32:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 06:59:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 03:42:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 03:31:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 01:01:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 23:19:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 21:02:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 20:43:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-13 15:26:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 18:20:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 12:57:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 10:38:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 08:38:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 02:47:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 02:19:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 01:11:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 22:15:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 20:41:44 -0600 | Rating Details |