Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-12 12:25:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78528F8F9993E455C9C7449D5E2886AD39DB771FC878EF8DA1AA413A52A51EA2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The legality of Jack Smith’s appointment is very questionable. Brief provided to SCOTUS by former AG Edwin Meese III, and law professors, Stephan G Calabrisi, and Gary S Lawson. Again, that Garland was this careless in an appointment this important, smells. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-624/293864/20231220140217967_US%20v.%20Trump%20amicus%20final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878257709197193448
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 78528F8F9993E455C9C7449D5E2886AD39DB771FC878EF8DA1AA413A52A51EA2
  • createdAtMillis - 1736684706717
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 187825770919719344878528F8F9993E455C9C7449D5E2886AD39DB771FC878EF8DA1AA413A52A51EA2