Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-12-27 07:08:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9F6594B1DB1AAC23AF8923811A787AB9B93F3FDACC722FCFCAD9238FE71B561
Participant Details

Original Note:

logical spring duck, sources you provide state only a sampling of the sigs were plucked from the batch, at least 22 of those sampled, were fraudulent. Your sources also state that it is believed that as many as 150 could have been fraudulent.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1872412815757123731
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C9F6594B1DB1AAC23AF8923811A787AB9B93F3FDACC722FCFCAD9238FE71B561
  • createdAtMillis - 1735283294655
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1872412815757123731C9F6594B1DB1AAC23AF8923811A787AB9B93F3FDACC722FCFCAD9238FE71B561