Birdwatch Note
2024-12-26 22:42:57 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
logical spring duck, sources you provide state only a sampling of the sigs were plucked from the batch, at least 22 of those sampled, were fraudulent. Your sources also state that it is believed that as many as 150 could have been fraudulent.
Written by A89A162835092961E276E8445AFA64A52B97D0E0C7B1E8670E5108D2E837795E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1871711202835054726
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1872412815757123731
- noteId - 1872412815757123731
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A89A162835092961E276E8445AFA64A52B97D0E0C7B1E8670E5108D2E837795E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1735252977682
- tweetId - 1871711202835054726
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- logical spring duck, sources you provide state only a sampling of the sigs were plucked from the batch, at least 22 of those sampled, were fraudulent. Your sources also state that it is believed that as many as 150 could have been fraudulent.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-27 01:08:14 -0600 | Rating Details |