Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-28 19:42:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CDC12505AEEBDB548211BC659BE532ED1FC2C418D2D803EDC24C4C10D68BEC87
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. No such article has appeared in the Guardian. https://fullfact.org/online/fake-guardian-article-gaza-bradford/?utm_content=buffer90843&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1862216369787294098
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CDC12505AEEBDB548211BC659BE532ED1FC2C418D2D803EDC24C4C10D68BEC87
  • createdAtMillis - 1732822926549
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1862216369787294098CDC12505AEEBDB548211BC659BE532ED1FC2C418D2D803EDC24C4C10D68BEC87