Birdwatch Note
2024-11-28 19:25:55 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This is false. No such article has appeared in the Guardian. https://fullfact.org/online/fake-guardian-article-gaza-bradford/?utm_content=buffer90843&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Written by DB3B4C0CE250F95086741BC57AB1CBA81E6B2C9BECDD7D1083F2D0AE26BD64EE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1859847926752661710
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1862216369787294098
- noteId - 1862216369787294098
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DB3B4C0CE250F95086741BC57AB1CBA81E6B2C9BECDD7D1083F2D0AE26BD64EE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1732821955521
- tweetId - 1859847926752661710
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is false. No such article has appeared in the Guardian. https://fullfact.org/online/fake-guardian-article-gaza-bradford/?utm_content=buffer90843&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-28 13:42:06 -0600 | Rating Details |