Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-23 23:44:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F94EA3CE50161B3FFC84F1185C813D1151164E5E1FF29ECDD494F289CA869CB0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - previous CN links to questionable sources from Tufton Street think tanks and typical RW Spectator

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860276195671064578
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F94EA3CE50161B3FFC84F1185C813D1151164E5E1FF29ECDD494F289CA869CB0
  • createdAtMillis - 1732405476535
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1860276195671064578F94EA3CE50161B3FFC84F1185C813D1151164E5E1FF29ECDD494F289CA869CB0