Birdwatch Note
2024-11-23 10:56:21 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - previous CN links to questionable sources from Tufton Street think tanks and typical RW Spectator
Written by 970A89E3F63968BB2470C8BDD5821ACBBB8A01F5D32A371E7A900677E7B6B5EC
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1860041696836485388
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1860276195671064578
- noteId - 1860276195671064578
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 970A89E3F63968BB2470C8BDD5821ACBBB8A01F5D32A371E7A900677E7B6B5EC Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1732359381965
- tweetId - 1860041696836485388
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - previous CN links to questionable sources from Tufton Street think tanks and typical RW Spectator
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-23 16:35:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-23 13:17:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-23 06:22:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-23 17:44:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-23 18:08:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-23 16:43:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-23 06:02:23 -0600 | Rating Details |