Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-23 19:17:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EEC42BC402004C12DA1F7146F63BA46E0AC352194541D7FBFE4BDDCC1DBFB5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - previous CN links to questionable sources from Tufton Street think tanks and typical RW Spectator

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1860276195671064578
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0EEC42BC402004C12DA1F7146F63BA46E0AC352194541D7FBFE4BDDCC1DBFB5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1732389433858
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18602761956710645780EEC42BC402004C12DA1F7146F63BA46E0AC352194541D7FBFE4BDDCC1DBFB5F