Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-29 12:43:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7B9BFEB586044532A4204C7D1ECA5F3AB2EDD5C60CCA7A2B99AA5C9516EE16C7
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is false. "we conclude the legislative history supports an interpretation [...] where mail ballots without postmarks are counted when received by 5 p.m. on the third day after the election." Download link, bottom of page 7. https://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/document/view.do?csNameID=69963&csIID=69963&deLinkID=971139&onBaseDocumentNumber=24-40423

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1851075868694593562
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7B9BFEB586044532A4204C7D1ECA5F3AB2EDD5C60CCA7A2B99AA5C9516EE16C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1730205827142
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18510758686945935627B9BFEB586044532A4204C7D1ECA5F3AB2EDD5C60CCA7A2B99AA5C9516EE16C7