Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-29 01:37:33 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is false. "we conclude the legislative history supports an interpretation [...] where mail ballots without postmarks are counted when received by 5 p.m. on the third day after the election." Download link, bottom of page 7. https://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/document/view.do?csNameID=69963&csIID=69963&deLinkID=971139&onBaseDocumentNumber=24-40423

Written by 7365B5F8BE86CE35A91B8AC29E517C8E5B41C40866097E51387100C7E48FC49D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1850992400778609097

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1851075868694593562
  • noteId - 1851075868694593562
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7365B5F8BE86CE35A91B8AC29E517C8E5B41C40866097E51387100C7E48FC49D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1730165853080
  • tweetId - 1850992400778609097
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This is false. "we conclude the legislative history supports an interpretation [...] where mail ballots without postmarks are counted when received by 5 p.m. on the third day after the election." Download link, bottom of page 7. https://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/document/view.do?csNameID=69963&csIID=69963&deLinkID=971139&onBaseDocumentNumber=24-40423

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-29 12:52:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-29 09:04:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-29 08:56:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-29 07:24:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 22:09:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 21:10:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 20:57:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-29 06:20:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 22:13:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 22:06:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 22:04:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 21:47:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 21:23:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 20:59:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-29 07:43:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 22:13:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 21:40:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 21:22:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 21:21:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-29 00:47:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 22:12:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 22:03:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-29 11:10:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-29 00:38:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 23:17:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 22:47:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-28 22:36:51 -0500 Rating Details