Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 18:31:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B3FA53804E1B6294C0DA464C20D09B2A79FCA7A05AFF132D079AD238BD389BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN states it's for contempt of court not for playing a film, but as the first sentence in the linked article shows, the contempt charge was triggered by his showing of the film. Nothing misleading in the post; just a fact followed by an opinion. https://www.itv.com/news/2024-08-28/new-contempt-of-court-application-lodged-against-tommy-robinson

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848060439923720374
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B3FA53804E1B6294C0DA464C20D09B2A79FCA7A05AFF132D079AD238BD389BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1729449110925
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18480604399237203745B3FA53804E1B6294C0DA464C20D09B2A79FCA7A05AFF132D079AD238BD389BA