Birdwatch Note
2024-10-20 17:55:18 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
CN states it's for contempt of court not for playing a film, but as the first sentence in the linked article shows, the contempt charge was triggered by his showing of the film. Nothing misleading in the post; just a fact followed by an opinion. https://www.itv.com/news/2024-08-28/new-contempt-of-court-application-lodged-against-tommy-robinson
Written by C2DFD7261854F747C7303CCC06583ADDF612313490A370633498A9040CBE0ED0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1847994408941064650
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1848060439923720374
- noteId - 1848060439923720374
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C2DFD7261854F747C7303CCC06583ADDF612313490A370633498A9040CBE0ED0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1729446918837
- tweetId - 1847994408941064650
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- CN states it's for contempt of court not for playing a film, but as the first sentence in the linked article shows, the contempt charge was triggered by his showing of the film. Nothing misleading in the post; just a fact followed by an opinion. https://www.itv.com/news/2024-08-28/new-contempt-of-court-application-lodged-against-tommy-robinson
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-10-20 15:51:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-20 15:18:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-20 14:25:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-25 14:36:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-22 17:10:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-20 15:43:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-20 14:49:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-22 03:16:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-20 18:06:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-20 15:31:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-20 15:22:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-21 02:36:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-20 15:14:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-20 15:03:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-10-20 13:31:50 -0500 | Rating Details |