Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-03 13:59:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 67426F425AFBC15932151B18E17F4702A7C279A3AE67179AD9840DC99FA424C8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contexte : Bernard Lugan n'est plus un historien considéré comme fiable et sérieux. Ses thèses sont largement critiquées et remises en cause par la communauté des historiens, notamment pour sa défense de la colonisation. https://journals.openedition.org/chrhc/1273?lang=en https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/2001/10/07/des-africanistes-denoncent-la-promotion-d-un-historien-de-lyon-iii-proche-de-l-extreme-droite_4195277_1819218.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841816955369431409
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 67426F425AFBC15932151B18E17F4702A7C279A3AE67179AD9840DC99FA424C8
  • createdAtMillis - 1727963961413
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184181695536943140967426F425AFBC15932151B18E17F4702A7C279A3AE67179AD9840DC99FA424C8