Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 19:15:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E6DE56C24930095202C67EBE512234DF3F39A82FA71EA556DC6FE7D1C86A1187
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP's claim is that they did not refill it. This is technically true as they did not fill it back to the level at which they started drawing from. While some readers may find the proposed CN interesting, a comment is more appropriate as there is no factual error in OP's opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839288478699499678
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E6DE56C24930095202C67EBE512234DF3F39A82FA71EA556DC6FE7D1C86A1187
  • createdAtMillis - 1727378155300
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839288478699499678E6DE56C24930095202C67EBE512234DF3F39A82FA71EA556DC6FE7D1C86A1187