Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-26 12:58:40 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

OP's claim is that they did not refill it. This is technically true as they did not fill it back to the level at which they started drawing from. While some readers may find the proposed CN interesting, a comment is more appropriate as there is no factual error in OP's opinion.

Written by 0FD6C67AC62DD1458724FD380AFBC4C97AF175C8221E215E2DC710A51216F8A9
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1839288478699499678
• noteId - 1839288478699499678
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 0FD6C67AC62DD1458724FD380AFBC4C97AF175C8221E215E2DC710A51216F8A9 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1727355520307
• tweetId - 1839007836115972385
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• OP's claim is that they did not refill it. This is technically true as they did not fill it back to the level at which they started drawing from. While some readers may find the proposed CN interesting, a comment is more appropriate as there is no factual error in OP's opinion.