Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-26 22:33:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 865D7D91553182C8A0E9DA38E6F7E148ABDC9D0FA10272720994CA565E4182C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP's claim is that they did not refill it. This is technically true as they did not fill it back to the level at which they started drawing from. While some readers may find the proposed CN interesting, a comment is more appropriate as there is no factual error in OP's opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839288478699499678
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 865D7D91553182C8A0E9DA38E6F7E148ABDC9D0FA10272720994CA565E4182C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1727389988243
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839288478699499678865D7D91553182C8A0E9DA38E6F7E148ABDC9D0FA10272720994CA565E4182C9