Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-22 13:49:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F61B204F2B887EB3A1461DA1CC17FEE6D6DBF7358F363C728BEC812F004FADB0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: Yes, he was removed with a majority of votes, but it did not follow constitutional processes, as it did not happen with a large enough majority or a supreme court review. One can quibble if this was acceptable, but it was clearly not done constitutionally: https://www.rferl.org/a/was-yanukovychs-ouster-constitutional/25274346.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837840570921693461
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F61B204F2B887EB3A1461DA1CC17FEE6D6DBF7358F363C728BEC812F004FADB0
  • createdAtMillis - 1727012947013
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837840570921693461F61B204F2B887EB3A1461DA1CC17FEE6D6DBF7358F363C728BEC812F004FADB0