Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-09-22 13:05:12 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN: Yes, he was removed with a majority of votes, but it did not follow constitutional processes, as it did not happen with a large enough majority or a supreme court review. One can quibble if this was acceptable, but it was clearly not done constitutionally: https://www.rferl.org/a/was-yanukovychs-ouster-constitutional/25274346.html

Written by 2226E96050A817F9F66E0C66FC9FCA31F02B33292EF3743AD0AE6645C2F4D095
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1837840570921693461
• noteId - 1837840570921693461
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 2226E96050A817F9F66E0C66FC9FCA31F02B33292EF3743AD0AE6645C2F4D095 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1727010312192
• tweetId - 1837691401116492281
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 1
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• NNN: Yes, he was removed with a majority of votes, but it did not follow constitutional processes, as it did not happen with a large enough majority or a supreme court review. One can quibble if this was acceptable, but it was clearly not done constitutionally: https://www.rferl.org/a/was-yanukovychs-ouster-constitutional/25274346.html