Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-22 13:28:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C32BB712327B18A2360C16F5D7221E3CC8963A0095D367B9EA4D2960125FF8FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: Yes, he was removed with a majority of votes, but it did not follow constitutional processes, as it did not happen with a large enough majority or a supreme court review. One can quibble if this was acceptable, but it was clearly not done constitutionally: https://www.rferl.org/a/was-yanukovychs-ouster-constitutional/25274346.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837840570921693461
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C32BB712327B18A2360C16F5D7221E3CC8963A0095D367B9EA4D2960125FF8FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1727011711894
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837840570921693461C32BB712327B18A2360C16F5D7221E3CC8963A0095D367B9EA4D2960125FF8FA