Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 05:25:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6646EFB754964DA906B219128732E23A2C4E571BF5A0E47CAC0592ADC6B36793
Participant Details

Original Note:

日本に関心の高い層、すなわち偏ったサンプルを対象に調査していることから、「甲子園」の喩えが間違いであるとは言えません。 よって、追加のノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818489324847218988
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6646EFB754964DA906B219128732E23A2C4E571BF5A0E47CAC0592ADC6B36793
  • createdAtMillis - 1722403528512
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18184893248472189886646EFB754964DA906B219128732E23A2C4E571BF5A0E47CAC0592ADC6B36793