Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-31 03:30:15 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

日本に関心の高い層、すなわち偏ったサンプルを対象に調査していることから、「甲子園」の喩えが間違いであるとは言えません。 よって、追加のノートは不要です。

Written by 862DEEAECCE200906504BE43AABBC232FEE0C256BD251BACBBFF16D194EB69FA
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817832305848975543

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1818489324847218988
  • noteId - 1818489324847218988
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 862DEEAECCE200906504BE43AABBC232FEE0C256BD251BACBBFF16D194EB69FA Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722396615598
  • tweetId - 1817832305848975543
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • 日本に関心の高い層、すなわち偏ったサンプルを対象に調査していることから、「甲子園」の喩えが間違いであるとは言えません。 よって、追加のノートは不要です。

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-07-31 03:38:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 02:33:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-31 00:25:28 -0500 Rating Details