Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 03:51:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A9F47DD66CC0CCAD266CC88D3FC22C68EF916B4408E631133FFD5BBBBA0934AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Protect Act of 2003 was deemed unconstitutional and has nothing to do with this tweet. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/06-694

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818081496898695325
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A9F47DD66CC0CCAD266CC88D3FC22C68EF916B4408E631133FFD5BBBBA0934AC
  • createdAtMillis - 1722657075742
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818081496898695325A9F47DD66CC0CCAD266CC88D3FC22C68EF916B4408E631133FFD5BBBBA0934AC