Birdwatch Note
2024-07-30 00:29:41 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The Protect Act of 2003 was deemed unconstitutional and has nothing to do with this tweet. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/06-694
Written by 82D844BAFDAECD40B19DEF1AF96463015C7365C4D8B0D5DC2F979F253BE0B37D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816910505346498723
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1818081496898695325
- noteId - 1818081496898695325
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 82D844BAFDAECD40B19DEF1AF96463015C7365C4D8B0D5DC2F979F253BE0B37D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722299381838
- tweetId - 1816910505346498723
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The Protect Act of 2003 was deemed unconstitutional and has nothing to do with this tweet. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/06-694
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-02 22:51:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-31 10:52:00 -0500 | Rating Details |