Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-01 09:22:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F1E8F9ACAC54C2525D0109B49EBFCD6F3DBAA4A11DA019F3FB2BCB20D3C45156
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - While criticisms of sample sizes are valid in research, it is not typically CN's job to act in this capacity. Leave it for the replies or retweets.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818014882505310530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F1E8F9ACAC54C2525D0109B49EBFCD6F3DBAA4A11DA019F3FB2BCB20D3C45156
  • createdAtMillis - 1722504158809
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1818014882505310530F1E8F9ACAC54C2525D0109B49EBFCD6F3DBAA4A11DA019F3FB2BCB20D3C45156