Birdwatch Note
2024-07-29 20:04:59 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - While criticisms of sample sizes are valid in research, it is not typically CN's job to act in this capacity. Leave it for the replies or retweets.
Written by 01EF1293564DD7054EE0CC2A51F142C412326635F49FE55B4BF572EE0B671A29
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817965271014846510
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1818014882505310530
- noteId - 1818014882505310530
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 01EF1293564DD7054EE0CC2A51F142C412326635F49FE55B4BF572EE0B671A29 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722283499730
- tweetId - 1817965271014846510
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - While criticisms of sample sizes are valid in research, it is not typically CN's job to act in this capacity. Leave it for the replies or retweets.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-01 04:22:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-31 16:13:44 -0500 | Rating Details |