Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 21:13:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E247B6637AFF2A659739F1F1A0941FFC2D8C9795A4023EEB1D043B7B4464912
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - While criticisms of sample sizes are valid in research, it is not typically CN's job to act in this capacity. Leave it for the replies or retweets.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1818014882505310530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E247B6637AFF2A659739F1F1A0941FFC2D8C9795A4023EEB1D043B7B4464912
  • createdAtMillis - 1722460424937
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18180148825053105308E247B6637AFF2A659739F1F1A0941FFC2D8C9795A4023EEB1D043B7B4464912