Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 00:12:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FB32BE0C072F87D71246A37DF005C78A3F26ED4BA838CD368DCBFF5E320FE539
Participant Details

Original Note:

この投稿は単に、いわゆる「頂き女子」などの詐欺事件の量刑に比べ性犯罪の量刑が軽すぎるという主張をしたまでであり、詐欺行為を擁護するような内容も含まれていません。 誤解を招く要素のない個人的な意見に対してコミュニティノートは不要であると考えます。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1815354711807234048
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FB32BE0C072F87D71246A37DF005C78A3F26ED4BA838CD368DCBFF5E320FE539
  • createdAtMillis - 1729383179815
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1815354711807234048FB32BE0C072F87D71246A37DF005C78A3F26ED4BA838CD368DCBFF5E320FE539