Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-21 18:38:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B128500F120235CFA508DEF024CDCE01956907A11671DA22DFAE5007055F1F99
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Fifth Circuit had ruled in favor of Rahimi that the federal law in question was unconstitutional. If SCOTUS had not agreed to hear the case, that ruling would have remained the law in the entire circuit. Gun control advocates supported SCOTUS taking up the case. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf https://www.bradyunited.org/about-us/press/sc-cert-rahimi-case

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1804212579511996485
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B128500F120235CFA508DEF024CDCE01956907A11671DA22DFAE5007055F1F99
  • createdAtMillis - 1718995120364
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1804212579511996485B128500F120235CFA508DEF024CDCE01956907A11671DA22DFAE5007055F1F99