Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-06-21 17:59:34 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Fifth Circuit had ruled in favor of Rahimi that the federal law in question was unconstitutional. If SCOTUS had not agreed to hear the case, that ruling would have remained the law in the entire circuit. Gun control advocates supported SCOTUS taking up the case. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf https://www.bradyunited.org/about-us/press/sc-cert-rahimi-case

Written by 6F8D7F3F1DB7D39EA38A5DD7DDB7779C4CE331EAEC528C24A8A6F42523FB04E3
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1804212579511996485
• noteId - 1804212579511996485
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 6F8D7F3F1DB7D39EA38A5DD7DDB7779C4CE331EAEC528C24A8A6F42523FB04E3 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1718992774263
• tweetId - 1804164277663863278
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The Fifth Circuit had ruled in favor of Rahimi that the federal law in question was unconstitutional. If SCOTUS had not agreed to hear the case, that ruling would have remained the law in the entire circuit. Gun control advocates supported SCOTUS taking up the case. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf https://www.bradyunited.org/about-us/press/sc-cert-rahimi-case