Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-07 14:59:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD61622665BD9AAE6961316ADDD01E95224B410C2C2A3606989F3E25B66E8E64
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. O texto do deputado está obviamente carregado de ideologia, mas a conclusão é plausível sim. Ao negar o provimento do recurso, o STF afirmou que o direito ao uso do banheiro feminino não está regulamentado e carece de discussão mais ampla. Discutam nos comentários. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/hermeneutica-juridica/401301519/amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799057188432031772
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD61622665BD9AAE6961316ADDD01E95224B410C2C2A3606989F3E25B66E8E64
  • createdAtMillis - 1717772385260
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799057188432031772FD61622665BD9AAE6961316ADDD01E95224B410C2C2A3606989F3E25B66E8E64