Birdwatch Note
2024-06-07 12:33:53 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. O texto do deputado está obviamente carregado de ideologia, mas a conclusão é plausível sim. Ao negar o provimento do recurso, o STF afirmou que o direito ao uso do banheiro feminino não está regulamentado e carece de discussão mais ampla. Discutam nos comentários. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/hermeneutica-juridica/401301519/amp
Written by C8BAA7328A409865F0B039DEA4A66035BB2CC7B9771B93BFFC0BA095FDC1DC7D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1798862404706844832
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1799057188432031772
- noteId - 1799057188432031772
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C8BAA7328A409865F0B039DEA4A66035BB2CC7B9771B93BFFC0BA095FDC1DC7D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1717763633245
- tweetId - 1798862404706844832
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. O texto do deputado está obviamente carregado de ideologia, mas a conclusão é plausível sim. Ao negar o provimento do recurso, o STF afirmou que o direito ao uso do banheiro feminino não está regulamentado e carece de discussão mais ampla. Discutam nos comentários. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/hermeneutica-juridica/401301519/amp
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-06-07 12:33:53 UTC (1717763633245) |
2024-06-08 23:55:36 UTC (1717890936442) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-06-11 02:27:24 UTC (1718072844058) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-06-08 23:55:36 UTC (1717890936442) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-06-08 11:57:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 10:06:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 08:18:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 07:56:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 23:45:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 13:40:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 12:05:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 09:59:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 09:51:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 09:49:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 09:34:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 09:02:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-08 20:55:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-08 10:42:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 19:20:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 14:06:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 14:02:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 13:47:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 12:37:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 10:27:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 08:44:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 07:51:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 07:50:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-07 07:47:47 -0500 | Rating Details |