Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 01:55:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C40825F63E2B8509C8CB9E59910D39E9F274E909F3D16AB542DEE1B64AB573C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. O texto do deputado está obviamente carregado de ideologia, mas a conclusão é plausível sim. Ao negar o provimento do recurso, o STF afirmou que o direito ao uso do banheiro feminino não está regulamentado e carece de discussão mais ampla. Discutam nos comentários. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/artigos/hermeneutica-juridica/401301519/amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799057188432031772
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C40825F63E2B8509C8CB9E59910D39E9F274E909F3D16AB542DEE1B64AB573C
  • createdAtMillis - 1717898116085
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17990571884320317728C40825F63E2B8509C8CB9E59910D39E9F274E909F3D16AB542DEE1B64AB573C