Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-31 18:26:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E462428017E7606AC21B038B167191E23802F90B87D55EBABF2CA069F9F81BFE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Affirmation fausse. Voici les chiffres tirés de la table 1. En faveur de l'hypothèse: 892 (19+413+460) Neutres: 2104 Contre l'hypothèse: 4 (2 + 1 + 1) Ce qui donne 892/896=99.55% (en ignorant les articles neutres qui ne sont donc PAS considérés comme pro-consensuels. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375095214_Ninety-Nine_Percent_Re-Examining_the_Consensus_on_the_Anthropogenic_Contribution_to_Climate_Change

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1796595284123738600
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E462428017E7606AC21B038B167191E23802F90B87D55EBABF2CA069F9F81BFE
  • createdAtMillis - 1717179970729
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1796595284123738600E462428017E7606AC21B038B167191E23802F90B87D55EBABF2CA069F9F81BFE