Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-05-31 17:31:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Affirmation fausse. Voici les chiffres tirés de la table 1. En faveur de l'hypothèse: 892 (19+413+460) Neutres: 2104 Contre l'hypothèse: 4 (2 + 1 + 1) Ce qui donne 892/896=99.55% (en ignorant les articles neutres qui ne sont donc PAS considérés comme pro-consensuels. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375095214_Ninety-Nine_Percent_Re-Examining_the_Consensus_on_the_Anthropogenic_Contribution_to_Climate_Change

Written by 10E9F98F8676CADCDAC8DF019DF28DCD726F15096878BEFD9CC823F722EEB847
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1796540927957414047

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1796595284123738600
  • noteId - 1796595284123738600
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 10E9F98F8676CADCDAC8DF019DF28DCD726F15096878BEFD9CC823F722EEB847
  • createdAtMillis - 1717176669518
  • tweetId - 1796540927957414047
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Affirmation fausse. Voici les chiffres tirés de la table 1. En faveur de l'hypothèse: 892 (19+413+460) Neutres: 2104 Contre l'hypothèse: 4 (2 + 1 + 1) Ce qui donne 892/896=99.55% (en ignorant les articles neutres qui ne sont donc PAS considérés comme pro-consensuels. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375095214_Ninety-Nine_Percent_Re-Examining_the_Consensus_on_the_Anthropogenic_Contribution_to_Climate_Change

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-05-31 17:31:09 UTC
(1717176669518)
2024-06-01 20:30:45 UTC
(1717273845217)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-06-02 01:35:54 UTC
(1717292154387)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-06-01 20:30:45 UTC
(1717273845217)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-06-01 11:42:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-01 05:54:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-31 16:14:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-31 13:26:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-31 13:18:20 -0500 Rating Details