Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-24 16:33:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6F8D7F3F1DB7D39EA38A5DD7DDB7779C4CE331EAEC528C24A8A6F42523FB04E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, they didn't. They published a balanced view, acknowledging both the potential benefits and concerns associated with 5G technology. The frequency in which electromagnetic radiation starts to ionize & become dangerous is about 3 million GHz, nowhere close to 5G. https://www.forbes.com/health/wellness/is-5g-safe/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/5g-is-coming-how-worried-should-we-be-about-the-health-risks/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/5g-devices-are-about-to-change-your-life/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/dont-fall-prey-to-scaremongering-about-5g/ https://www.sciencealert.com/major-review-still-finds-5g-technology-to-be-completely-safe

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1783122363338400135
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6F8D7F3F1DB7D39EA38A5DD7DDB7779C4CE331EAEC528C24A8A6F42523FB04E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1713976415916
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17831223633384001356F8D7F3F1DB7D39EA38A5DD7DDB7779C4CE331EAEC528C24A8A6F42523FB04E3