Birdwatch Note
2024-04-24 13:14:34 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
No, they didn't. They published a balanced view, acknowledging both the potential benefits and concerns associated with 5G technology. The frequency in which electromagnetic radiation starts to ionize & become dangerous is about 3 million GHz, nowhere close to 5G. https://www.forbes.com/health/wellness/is-5g-safe/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/5g-is-coming-how-worried-should-we-be-about-the-health-risks/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/5g-devices-are-about-to-change-your-life/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/dont-fall-prey-to-scaremongering-about-5g/ https://www.sciencealert.com/major-review-still-finds-5g-technology-to-be-completely-safe
Written by 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1783065851790254294
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1783122363338400135
- noteId - 1783122363338400135
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1713964474887
- tweetId - 1783065851790254294
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- No, they didn't. They published a balanced view, acknowledging both the potential benefits and concerns associated with 5G technology. The frequency in which electromagnetic radiation starts to ionize & become dangerous is about 3 million GHz, nowhere close to 5G. https://www.forbes.com/health/wellness/is-5g-safe/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/5g-is-coming-how-worried-should-we-be-about-the-health-risks/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/5g-devices-are-about-to-change-your-life/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/dont-fall-prey-to-scaremongering-about-5g/ https://www.sciencealert.com/major-review-still-finds-5g-technology-to-be-completely-safe
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-04-24 13:14:34 UTC (1713964474887) |
2024-04-24 16:41:51 UTC (1713976911074) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-04-25 02:10:52 UTC (1714011052871) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-04-24 16:41:51 UTC (1713976911074) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-04-24 19:30:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 16:51:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 10:27:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 10:18:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 10:00:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:57:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:56:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:40:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:33:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:13:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 08:37:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 08:25:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 14:42:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 11:33:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 11:33:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 11:23:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 10:13:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 10:02:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:58:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:49:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:48:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:31:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 08:56:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 13:39:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 10:11:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 10:02:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 10:01:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:30:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:12:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-03 03:20:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 11:37:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 10:16:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:57:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:53:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 09:05:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 08:52:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 08:45:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 08:42:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 08:32:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-24 08:25:16 -0500 | Rating Details |