Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 02:01:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D326576FDA91E42C280F95551D8056496955846761C588357E3BC57EDE651E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass Review does not contain any new evidence or opinion. It only mentions toys because it later quotes diagnostic criteria that are used in gender clinics. As a systematic review, it simply sets out evidence that it later quotes and uses. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894019/#:~:text=Systematic%20review%20and%20meta%2Danalysis%20is%20a%20way%20of%20summarizing,of%20the%20hierarchy%20of%20evidence.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778402313238896643
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D326576FDA91E42C280F95551D8056496955846761C588357E3BC57EDE651E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1712887306029
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17784023132388966430D326576FDA91E42C280F95551D8056496955846761C588357E3BC57EDE651E4