Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-04-11 12:38:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Cass Review does not contain any new evidence or opinion. It only mentions toys because it later quotes diagnostic criteria that are used in gender clinics. As a systematic review, it simply sets out evidence that it later quotes and uses. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894019/#:~:text=Systematic%20review%20and%20meta%2Danalysis%20is%20a%20way%20of%20summarizing,of%20the%20hierarchy%20of%20evidence.

Written by 55089339CD9788AEC59BBD1EDEBEF5E127F1BF4FC03E395A98FD9398F9253A3B
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1778402313238896643
• noteId - 1778402313238896643
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 55089339CD9788AEC59BBD1EDEBEF5E127F1BF4FC03E395A98FD9398F9253A3B Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1712839127250
• tweetId - 1778184206696521809
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The Cass Review does not contain any new evidence or opinion. It only mentions toys because it later quotes diagnostic criteria that are used in gender clinics. As a systematic review, it simply sets out evidence that it later quotes and uses. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894019/#:~:text=Systematic%20review%20and%20meta%2Danalysis%20is%20a%20way%20of%20summarizing,of%20the%20hierarchy%20of%20evidence.