Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-18 17:21:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87137E79E85D3A3A0EC975E15BD6C252821EF5D8E8CF181333295FFEC34669CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

L’article en question pointe vers un article encore en proof reading, c’est clairement une revue prédatrice (très faible impact factor, des tarifs et durée de peer reviewing affichés…) https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/ajog-global-reports Les revues plus sérieuses donnent tort à cet article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219575/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00698-8 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X23003328

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759170498166943994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 87137E79E85D3A3A0EC975E15BD6C252821EF5D8E8CF181333295FFEC34669CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1708276914092
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175917049816694399487137E79E85D3A3A0EC975E15BD6C252821EF5D8E8CF181333295FFEC34669CA