Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-02-18 10:58:25 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

L’article en question pointe vers un article encore en proof reading, c’est clairement une revue prédatrice (très faible impact factor, des tarifs et durée de peer reviewing affichés…) https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/ajog-global-reports Les revues plus sérieuses donnent tort à cet article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219575/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00698-8 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X23003328

Written by 9650E33A05159D9525738007625D863540C3F634D7CF64C3815596353F85CA3F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1759136108829360628

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1759170498166943994
  • noteId - 1759170498166943994
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9650E33A05159D9525738007625D863540C3F634D7CF64C3815596353F85CA3F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1708253905229
  • tweetId - 1759136108829360628
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 1
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • L’article en question pointe vers un article encore en proof reading, c’est clairement une revue prédatrice (très faible impact factor, des tarifs et durée de peer reviewing affichés…) https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/ajog-global-reports Les revues plus sérieuses donnent tort à cet article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10219575/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00698-8 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X23003328

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-02-18 10:58:25 UTC
(1708253905229)
2024-02-19 01:19:56 UTC
(1708305596456)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-02-19 09:04:13 UTC
(1708333453151)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-02-19 01:19:56 UTC
(1708305596456)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-02-18 21:59:00 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 18:56:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 16:25:21 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 16:20:00 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 16:09:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 13:51:58 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 11:21:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 10:16:11 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 08:10:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 02:17:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 23:52:56 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 19:55:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 14:53:52 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 14:51:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 13:41:58 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 13:29:27 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 13:17:31 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 12:08:38 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 11:17:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 09:51:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 09:47:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 09:25:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 08:52:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 07:05:57 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 05:19:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-18 05:16:10 -0600 Rating Details